Showing posts with label Ishtar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ishtar. Show all posts

23 October 2023

Baga Stana

The representations & inscriptions near the place of God, have been alloted to different figures:

Khwaday Namag lists all sjahs from Khosrow II back to Keyumars, the first human who fought Ahriman & whose grandson seems to be the equivalent of Tubal Cain. The list is shorter then the number of sjahs in mainstream history, so some duplicates might exist:

Near the ancient Ka'ba-ye Zartosht, the translation of the inscription suggests Darius I to be the son of Hystaspes, the equivalent of Vishtaspa in the Avesta. His ancestor Ariaramnes might refer to Airyanem Vaejah, where Ahriman created winter & his son as a Naga in the river Vahvi Daitya: Should some Garden of Eden be situated where four sources of the river Amu Darya coalesce close to each other, close to a possible Shambhala?

The New Chronology claims the original once ruled in Palermo & the battles versus evil in Shahnameh are duplicates of the battle of Moscow: The national epic & inscriptions were translated around the same epoch, so did European history serve as inspiration to hide Anunnaki existence?

The carved images rather resemble Anunnaki, while their location is quite unaccessible to humans, supporting the claim of carvings made by the wife of Nimrod. However supposedly nearly two millenia older, a nearby petroglyph shows similar images, where Anubanini tramples a foe & Ishtar offers him two prisoners: Are we dealing with a Biblical Shift here?

Two years after the translation efforts, Howard Vyse claimed the Pyramid of Khufu to be a burial site, although for centuries, that same Nimrod has been noted as its possible builder. As Nikola Tesla suggested, the pyramids seem to have served another purpose: Did the Rothschilds, who took financial control of the British Empire after the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte, sponsor those researchers to alter history?

06 August 2023

Adam Kadmon

The first chapter in the book of Genesis mentions that Elohim created the earthly realm, as well as men & women in their image. Cuneiform tablets mention Enlil as separator of heaven & earth, as well as being creator of plant & animal life, but Enki is credited as the creator of mankind: Do these tablets confirm the polytheistic situation on the first pages of the Bible?

Those Anunnaki seem to have been interested in mining gold, which they mainly found in the far south of Africa, where the research of Michael Tellinger suggests the regional stone ruins to be remnants of the oldest known civilization, whose artwork seems to have been inherited by Sumer & Egypt. His conclusion corresponds with the research of Zecharia Sitchin, who claims those aliens arrived around that time. Being annoyed of working, a decision was made to create a terrestrial labor force:

  • Do cultural depictions of mixed creatures hint to genetic engineering in the quest for an optimal specie?
  • Is the noncoding DNA in Homo Sapiens actually desactivated divine genome?

The writers of Enuma Elish later adapted the story, wherein Marduk is portrayed as union of Enlil & Enki: He beats the Igigi, who look like Nāga & were led by Kingu, whose blood & brain were mixed with clay to create Adapa, what might be an attempt to explain the evil part present in people. As possible duplicate of Nimrod, he might have created the Tower of Babel in the Garden of Eden: Is he the monotheistic character on the following pages of the Bible?

The second chapter in the book of Genesis indeed mentions one God, who first created a man out of clay, followed by a woman out of one of his ribs. The confusion with its first chapter contributed to the emergence of the story of Lilith: Created out of loam, she disobeyed Adam & even married Ahriman. Disguised as a Nāgi, she revisited the so called paradise to offer the Forbidden Fruit. Although depicted as evil by Yahweh, her role mirrors Enki, but she rather resembles Inanna: Is she a possible duplicate of Ishtar?

The first chapter in the book of Genesis was interpreted by the philosophers of Kabbalah as God creating an androgynous being of light in the spiritual world, out of a vacuum He caused within the infinite light: Might the idea of a universe existing within a multiverse have originated here?

21 March 2023

Yekuno Amlak

Known as the historical equivalent of the traditional Menelik, he started the dynasty a few years after the Samalas Eruption: Did he travel from Jerusalem to Ethiopia after the medieval Trojan War & bring the Ark of the Covenant finally to Axum?

However, he never claimed to be a descendant of Solomon, as also some rabbinistic scholars do, so the propaganda against the Zagwe might have been inspired by different histories:

  • About 400 years after the official foundation of Karakorum, his descendants founded Gondar; before they were wandering nomads in tent camps
  • The origins of the Zagwe officially go back to the murder of the king of Axum by Gudit, which resembles the story in the book of Judith; researcher Anatoly Fomenko even claims the book of Esther is also a duplicate

In the above mentioned book, Haman is considered to be an Amalekite; in the Quran he is described as opposing the Jews & is ordered by the pharaoh to build a Tower of Babel, making the following duplicates possible: Eshter = Ishtar & Mordecai = Marduk?

As researcher Simcha Jacobovici suggests, the chronology of the book of Exodus is probably incorrect: As Cush might be identified as Midian, where the Jews fought Amalekites, do Rufaa & Damot compose the toponym Rephidim?

The name of the capital of Beta Israel seems to have been inspirational for some authors:

The father of founder Fasilides lived around the Time of Troubles: Did he actually as well, as also might have happened with migrants to Manchuria & Afghanistan, for the latter taking a chronological shift of 100 years into account, flee the Romanovs?