Trojan Horse

When Paris abducted Helen, it started the Trojan War, which ended by the trick with the Trojan Horse, whereafter Aeneas managed to escape the burning city. The trick with the hollow horse is a bit odd; the following questions pop up in my mind:

• Nobody noticed a possible entrance to the belly of the horse?
• None of the hidden soldiers sneezed or coughed the whole time?
• They could remain noiseless when the horse suddenly started to move?
• ...

The Aeneid covers the story of the hollow horse: In Latin, 'horse' translates as 'equus', while 'water' translates as 'aqua'. Before the invention of printing press, a mistake in copying happened easily: Could 'equus' have replaced 'aqua', in connection with the verb 'ducere', which translates as 'to lead'?

This question is brought forward by the New Chronology: Did the seizure of Troy happen as in early medieval Naples?

According to them, the ruïns of Hisarlik are too small for being the remnants of that once so mighty city. They suggest it should be Tsargrad & they could be right: When the Greeks recaptured late medieval Constantinople, being lost to the Latins since the Fourth Crusade, they used a secret passage near the Gate of the Spring ...

"Νεά Πολις" & "Nova Roma" nearly mean the same, as does "𐤒𐤓𐤕 𐤇𐤃𐤔𐤕". The Aeneid covers the love story of Dido & Aeneas too: Though they've been born centuries apart, in the story they met, proving ancient Virgil indeed wrote propaganda. How about late medieval Virgil?

I mentioned the importance of national propaganda already in a former post: Authors Robert Grishin & Vladimir Melamed suggest in chapter fourteen of their book the mentioned namesakes are doubles. That's right, even Shakespeare might not have been who we think he was, also according to Petter Amundsen ...

Falsified History

My former two posts might make clear that something might be wrong with the interpretation of our historical record. Already in the 17th century skeptics as Isaac Newton & Jean Hardouin criticized the generally accepted chronology of ancient & medieval history compiled by Joseph Scaliger & Dionysus Petavius. Nikolai Morozov used mathematics & astronomy to show that history has been tampered with, which influenced Anatoly Fomenko to compile a New Chronology. Also Immanuel Velikovsky, Florin Diacu & Garry Kasparov, in his Mathematics of the Past, share their opinions on a tampered world history ...

The works of all these authors contain the general notion of a collapsing world-empire at the end of what we consider to be the Middle Ages. This aligns quite well with the research of World-Systems Analysis: The world-economy we’re living in today can only be the result of a collapsed world-empire.

• The important difference between those two types of world-system is that a world-economy has scattered political power among different entities, about 200 nations nowadays, while a world-empire is just 1 political entity, eventually helped by subsidiary provinces ...
• The important similarity between those two types of world-system is that both of them are 1 economic entity. In a world-empire just 1 set of laws applies to everyone, but in a world-economy you can choose between about 200 different ones nowadays. I guess you can guess why a stakeholder of an MNC favors this situation ...

Also the tracking of economic cycles seems to point out that our history might have been tampered with. A nice indication of the existence of a medieval world-empire that encompassed the whole of Eurasia, North Africa & even the Latin American highlands might be found in the position of Vladimir, a Russian city whose name means “ruler of the world”: You can find many of the Eurasian capitals in concentric circles around it ...