Showing posts with label Belisarius. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Belisarius. Show all posts

12 November 2024

Kali Yuga

During the iron age or darkest yuga, humanity is mainly focused on materialism. In the book of Daniel it is named as a last of four kingdoms, identified as the Roman Empire. The former three identifie as follows, according to the mentioned religious clergy:

YugaAgeSalomon de TroyesJerome of Stridon
DwaparaBronzeMacedonian EmpireMacedonian Empire
TetraSilverChaldean EmpireAchaemenid Empire
SatyaGoldBabylonian EmpireBabylonian Empire

They differ in their second kingdom, respectively ruled by Belshazzar & Cyrus the Great, while the book even mentions Darius the Mede, a king between those protagonists:

Which leads us to the following questions:

Flavius Belisarius & Charles of Anjou both captured Naples with a trick, as Cyrus the Great did similarly with Babylon, all partial duplicates of final stage of the Trojan War: Is the seizure of Constantinopolis their original?

Michael Palaiologos also fought against duchies in Hellas & the 300 knights of John de La Roche, as did Xerxes the Great against the 300 of Leonidas: Have many medieval biographies been mixed, as might have happened to the mentioned protagonists?

The researchers of the New Chronology described the Macedonian Empire as a duplicate of the Ottoman Empire, in that context the mentioned Baylonian Empire then being the Latin Empire, which also might have partially been duplicated as following dynasties:

Both ultimately lasted for about a millenium, in accordance with the biblical kingdom in the book of Revelation: Do the first three kingdoms in the book of Daniel rather represent internal conflict within the Tartarian Empire?

The last kingdom then probably refers to the hidden Illuminati Empire: Is our yuga actually Satan's Little Season, as described in the book of Revelation?

21 September 2022

Palaia Roma

According to mainstream antiquity, Phoenicians founded the first settlements, among which 𐤑‬𐤉𐤑, on its western shores, whereafter Sicily mainly got colonized by Hellenes on the other shorelines. Although the latter ones occupied Palermo only for a short time, officialy it derives from παν όρμος, but does παλαιά Ῥώμη actually fit better?

According to the New Chronology, the so called "First Rome" should be located near the Nile Delta: They suggest Alexandria as the probable spot, where the famous lighthouse counted as one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. However, proof of its existence lacks and nearby Sicily we find Stromboli, known as the "Lighthouse of the Mediterranean": Did the famous library actually burn in Palermo?

Its present historical architecture has roots going back till the 11th century AD. This fits the research of the New Chronology, its history hints to the following duplicates:

Φλάβιος Βελισάριος also conquered Naples, as did Charles of Anjou, or the Νεά Πολις of Παλαιό Πολις, similar to the city structure of Palermo. Paris is similar to Persia, that's why he might be a duplicate of Cyrus. Περσέ Πολις, as well as Πέλλα, lacks the features of a capital of a world-empire. Medieval wars in Ἑλλάς might have their exaggerated duplicates in antiquity:

A Sicilian Expidition became a disaster for Athens, but for example not for the Normans, or even Aeneas: He supposedly visited the island twice, the last time holding funeral games for Anchises. Did he already found a Ῥώμη on the island, before Romulus & Remus founded a new one on the mainland, and are "Romans" eventually ancient reverse duplicates of "Normans"?

16 July 2021

Samalas Eruption

In 1257 AD one of the largest volcanic eruptions took place on Lombok, causing worldwide catastrophies the subsequent years, possibly even resulting in the Little Ice Age. It was an outburst of similar strength as the well knows of Santorini, Vesuvius, Tambora & Krakatoa ...

In The Medieval Empire of the Israelites, the authors describe that glacial cores point out a catastrophe must have taken place around 1260 AD. Ten years later, scientists concluded Segara Anak was the result of that catastrophic eruption. For these authors, the mentioned year is a key to understand history, some important historical turning points took place around that time:

Although at first glance these events seem unconnected to each other, some interesting questions arise:

  • As the Mongols, the Byzantines got defeated first, however the latter ones were succesful one year later: Might the spring of Goliath refer to the spring near Constantinople, of which the nearby gate contributed to the surprising seizure?
  • Cadiz means stronghold, while Constantinople is famous for its walls: Could it be the former ones captured it too under their pseudonym Castilians, although mainstream history claims otherwise?

Considering these similarities, is one real historical blueprint used to, at least partially, invent some fake histories for different regions, so creating some fake history & hiding some real history?

About one millenium earlier, around 536 AD, a volcanic eruption also caused extreme weather events & crop failures. Late in that year the troops of Flavius Belisarius seized Naples by using an abandoned aqueduct to capture the city by surprise: Is this a duplicate story of the mentioned seizure, as well as the seizure of Troy?