Tree of Life

According to Genesis, this plant stood in the Garden of Eden: Besides Kemet, this concept of fertility or immortality can also be found among many traditions around the world ...

According to Gnosticism, the tree should be situated north of paradise: Some traditions unify it with the other tree to a World Tree, associating it with the concept of Axis Mundi. Besides plants, also rocks are considered as center of the world:

• Rupes Nigra: Do the four rivers refer to the location of Eden?
• Mount Meru: Does the occasionally added prefix refer to Sumer?

The black rock might be the center of Hyperborea, possibly with Thule as capital. The Lords of the Black Stone & the Order of the Black Sun were looking for the roots of the Aryans: Might they be the Nemnir living in the polar regions?

According to Jean-Claude Frère, once a part of them migrated through Great Tartary, along the Himalaya Mountains to the Indus Valley. Thereafter, some migrated west: A schism follows, resulting in Hinduism & Zoroastrism, where Ahriman created lizards to destruct Gaokerena ...

The Soffhir are supposed to live in the equatorial regions: There's a Mount Meru, as well as Meru people & pyramids near Meroë. Pyramids & ziggurats might be artificial substitutes of holy mountains: Do they represent stepping stones of a Stairway to Heaven, or Jacob's Ladder?

The Kabbalistic Tree might have originated from Gnosticism & was well known among medieval Ashkenazi Jews: It emanates from אֵין סוֹף, the universe before creation took place or the Big Bang happened ...

Batu Khan

Known as the grandson of Genghis Khan, he extended the Mongol Empire north of the Khazar Sea, comparable to the realm of Attila the Hun: He conquered Kievan Rus & invaded Central Europe. According to the New Chronology, he's a duplicate of:

• Yaroslav Vladimirovich
• Yaroslav Vsevolodovich
• Ivan Danilovich

Yaroslav derives from Yarilo, who is also identified with Saint John, which becomes Ivan in Russian ...

The mainstream known territory of the Golden Horde is approximately equal to the Khazar Khaganate, both having Astrakhan as its possible capital, making their histories possible duplicates: Might its name refer to arrows used during their raids?

The mainstream known territory of the Golden Ring had to pay tribute to the Golden Horde. However, for the New Chronology, both are duplicates: Did mainstream historians use the Khazar Khaganate as inspiration for a Mongol Yoke?

According to mainstream history, the Golden Horde was later split into an eastern & western part, though it isn't clear which colour fits which compass point. The New Chronology, rejectants of that Mongol Yoke, suggests another division:

• Golden Horde: Great Russia or the Golden Ring, refering to the many golden onion domes
• Blue Horde: Little Russia or the Ukraine, crossed by many rivers, similar to Mesopotamia
• White Horde: White Ruthenia or the Muscovite Russia, where the "White Tsar" ruled

The White Horde stretched to Belarus, Prussia & the Balkan Peninsula: Did Batu Khan & his Venedi continue the conquest of his grandfather by reaching as far as Baetica & the Vatican? Another concentric circle of cities around Vladimir fits that suggestion ...

Genghis Khan

Know as the "Scourge of God", he founded a Mongol Empire, ranging from the Khazar Sea to the Tatar Strait, the area of Chinese & Independent Tartary. After destroying Zhongdu & defeating the Khwarazmian Empire, he seemed to have died in a war against the Great Jin ...

According to the New Chronology, those nomads couldn't realise such an empire. Temujin is actually Ryurik or one of the following rulers, all duplicates of each other:

• Yuri Vladimirovich
• Yuri Vsevolodovich
• Yuri Danilovich

All of them waged unifaction campaigns in Russia, as the Khagan supposedly did in Mongolia: That latter name might be derived from много, refering to the incorporated mini-systems, as Immanuel Wallerstein called them, in the growing world-empire?

As also mentioned before, Vladimir is suspiciously well positioned & named to fit the role of capital of a world-empire: Is the description of Attila's campaign the real initiation of the realm, resulting in the many castels around Eurasia?

According to the New Chronology, also Saint George is a duplicate of the great conqueror:

• Did he ride the white horse in the book of Revelation, beating the beast & his false prophet, after the defeat of Babylon?
• Being venerated in many parts of the Old World, did the mentioned world-empire encompass the northern part of it?

Hannibal Barcas

Famous for crossing the Alps with elephants & winning many battles against the Romans, this general never managed to conquer the eternal city & fled to Asia in the end, according to mainstream history. Some interesting questions arise:

• His campaign started on the Iberian Peninsula, but Elephas never lived in Europe. However, Iberia is a name used for two different regions: Could he have started from Caucasia?
• Carthage is located on the northern shores of Africa, but the name can also be found on another location: the district of Kadiköy in Istanbul bears the same etymology, could Dido have migrated to Anatolia instead?

The name Hannibal associates with the Phoenician deity Baal, sometimes honored by child sacrifice: It happened the worshippers ate the bodies, does "cannibalism" perhaps originate from "khan-i-baal", or "white khan"?

Hannibal Lecter is a famous cannibal in different movies, a character once performed by Anthony Hopkins, who also performed Titus Andronicus. If Tamora, also similar to Tomyris, refers to Tamar, Shakespeare might also hint to more similarities:

• Her name means figtree, whence the name Bethany comes: This is Bithynia, where Kadiköy is situated & Hannibal found shelter after his campaign ...
• Queen Tamar was shortly married to Yury Bogolyubsky, son of the Scythian Caesar, the character Tamora was shortly married to Saturninus, son of the dead emperor ...
• Bassianus is also an important high priest of the cult of Elagabalus, the solar variant of Baal, to whom the eldest son of Tamora might have been offered ...

The cannibal is the son of a Lithuanian duke & an Italian woman: Does this refer to the Veneti, who migrated from the Vistula to Veneto, where those Phoenicians found Venice? Might Latin actually have been derived from Lithuanian, or Latvian?

Titus Andronicus

This revenge tragedy of William Shakespeare shows the adventures of a general returning from a succesful military campaign. His name contains a Greek & an Italian part ...

According to the New Chronology, Andronicus is a partial duplicate of Jesus Christ, but also Titus is a candidate: Flavius Josephus might have been inpired by the life of the future emperor to create the character of the saviour to pacify the Jews. As well as Julius Caesar, he got deified and both of them won a famous seven year lasting war: Do these similarities hint to a partial duplicate?

The daughter of the protagonist bears the name of the second wife of Aeneas: According to Virgil, Turnus was the foreseen groom, but due to a dream Latinus changed his mind. Shakespreare wrote she was promised to Saturninus, but fell in love with his brother and fled with him. Is the character of the foreseen groom based on the king of the Rutulians?

However, in the revenge tragedy, Tamora and her surviving sons manage to kill Bassianus and rape Lavinia, whereas in the epic poem Turnus got killed earlier, so the storyline is different. Some authors identify the mentioned king as Titus, so might the inspiration for the mentioned rape come from the Abduction of the Sabine Women?

That event led to a shared reign of Titus & Romulus: After six years of mutual reign, the king of the Sabines got killed over a dispute. This resembles the fate of Remus: Gary Forsythe even claims the mentioned king was the first ruler of Rome, Romulus & Remus are only mythical characters in his opinion, as might the eldest sons of Adam & Eve be ...

According to the New Chronology, the life of the saviour inspired the author of the mentioned revenge tragedy a lot, cause also Hamlet, MacDuff & Apemantus seem to be partial duplicates of him, sometimes in a combination with John the Baptist. On the other hand, Lear & Henry VIII seem to be duplicates of Ivan the Terrible. His oeuvre is contemperary to that of Joseph Scaliger ...

Three Kings

Celebrated as Epiphany, the Magi arrived in Bethlehem to witness the birth of the king of the Jews: The physical manifestation of Jesus Christ to the גוים. Their number isn't mentioned in the gospel, but Western Christianity counts three of them, according to the number of gifts brought. Their origin remains a debate ...

According to the New Chronology, Melchior was even female, the מַלְכַּת שְׁבָא or ملكة سبأ, where Balthazar seems to be king, according to Hugo Kehrer. However, did the "White Tsar" rule the region between the Baltic Sea & the Balkan Peninsula, meaning "White Khanate", or "White Horde"?

That region is known for its very fertile soil: Bethlehem would be an appropriate name, opposite of Bethany, on the other side of the Black Sea. According to the New Chronology, the saviour was born in Crimea, could that be right?

The Armenian Church identifies Balthazar as king of Arabia, which might be a synonym for Europe. There Melchior is identified as king of Persia, which might mean Paris, but Johann von Hildesheim identifies him also as king of Nubia, where Caspar, according to the novel of Michel Tournier, is king of Meroë. That novelist might have been inspired by Piye, who defeated Sennacherib @ Jerusalem, or Memnon, who defeated Antilochus @ Troy, as described in Αἰθιοπίς: Might these stories be partial duplicates?

According to mainstream history, their relics have been brought from the Hagia Sophia, via Milan, finally to Cologne Cathedral. The Three Kings of Orion collinearly point, via Sirius, to the sunrise on Christmas around the Tropic of Cancer. By definition, Magi are Zoroastrian priests, so might the earthly tale, stuffed with gifts from Sheba, have been inspired by the long trek of Tiridates?

Three Maries

As big supporter of Jezus Christ, Mary Magdalene seems to be the first witness of his resurrection: She even might have fled to Gaul, been his wife & author of a gospel. These namesakes also lived during the epoch of the saviour: Mary the Virgin, Mary of Bethany, Mary of Clopas & Mary the Peaceful. Some might be duplicates, but also form groups of "Three Maries":

• In the sixth century, a pope identified Mary Magdalene as Mary of Bethany. Together with Mary the Virgin & Mary of Clopas, she attended the saviour's crucifixion.
• In the fifteenth century, someone claimed to have found the relics of Mary of Clopas & Mary the Peaceful near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, where they seem to have arrived by boat, together with Mary Magdalene. Also Mary of Bethany, together with her siblings Lazarus & Martha, seems to have arrived there.

According to Eastern Orthodoxy, Lazarus fled to Cyprus. According to mainstream history, emperor Andronikos Komnenos died in Constantinople, but some claim he managed to escape to Cyprus. Is the bishop of Kition a partial duplicate of the emperor, which might be a partial duplicate of the saviour?

That escape is similar to the escape of Aeneas, a name very similar to Aenon: The emperor had estates in Oinaion, so might he also be a partial duplicate of the saviour?

Could the son of Anchises have arrived by boat near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, instead of in Latium?

• Lavinium is similar to Avignon, where the popes lived in Babylonian Captivity
• Ascanius might have migrated as far as Avallon, similar to Alba Longa or Avalon, close to Paris, Troyes, Reims & Autun
• Brutus founded Tours before crossing the Channel

Are the Cathars right in claiming the saviour had a wife?

Stanley Kubrick

An increasing population in a finite habitat evolves to less resources per person: It increases the challenge to achieve it fully for all of humanity. However, till now, mankind rather evolved in the other direction, resulting in more dehumanization, the theme throughout the oeuvre of Kubrick ...

According to mainstream history, already since the dawn of man, sexism divided humanity into male hunters & female gatherers. When civilization evolved, the list can be extended, depending on the type of social system, according to Wallerstein:

• In mini-systems it might be profession or age
• In world-systems it might be social class or racism

Social class & racism in a world-system allow an international division of labour: The elite share a little bit of the profits with the working class in the core of the world-system, deliberately creating a fake psyche of happiness they’re less victim to dehumanization than their classmates in the periphery. The aim for the elite is clear: Maintaining the capitalist world-economy for their own benefits as long as possible ...

By hiding the real history of humanity people are unaware of their origin, which benefits the agenda of the elite too. As Orwell quoted: "Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." That's also why our mainstream education, science & media try to indoctrinate you they're the only source to believe in, that way actually admitting they're a religion too!

Although great personalities in our history have tried to change this trend, an unaware, maybe intelligent unable, population still allowed the elite to abuse this ignorance during the larger part of our history. But their greed is not only harming the majority of humanity, also our habitat is in danger. As Gandhi quoted: "The world has enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed." An awakened humanity is necessary to turn the tide!

Samalas Eruption

In 1257 AD one of the largest volcanic eruptions took place on Lombok, causing worldwide catastrophies the subsequent years, possibly even resulting in the Little Ice Age. It was an outburst of similar strength as the well knows of Santorini, Vesuvius, Tambora & Krakatoa ...

In The Medieval Empire of the Israelites, the authors describe that glacial cores point out a catastrophe must have taken place around 1260 AD. Ten years later, scientists concluded Segara Anak was the result of that catastrophic eruption. For these authors, the mentioned year is a key to understand history, some important historical turning points took place around that time:

• The Mamluk Sultanate beat the Mongol Empire near Ain Jalut, a first major defeat for the conquering nomads (1260 AD)
• The Byzantines besieged Constantinopolis, ultimately resulting in its seizure by Alexios Strategiopoulos (1261 AD)
• The Castilians captured Cadiz, ending the Reconquista, only allowing tribute paying Nasrids on the peninsula (1262 AD)

Although at first glance these events seem unconnected to each other, some interesting questions arise:

• As the Mongols, the Byzantines got defeated first, however the latter ones were succesful one year later: Might the spring of Goliath refer to the spring near Constantinople, of which the nearby gate contributed to the surprising seizure?
• Cadiz means stronghold, while Constantinople is famous for its walls: Could it be the former ones captured it too under their pseudonym Castilians, although mainstream history claims otherwise?

Considering these similarities, is one real historical blueprint used to, at least partially, invent some fake histories for different regions, so creating some fake history & hiding some real history?

About one millenium earlier, around 536 AD, a volcanic eruption also caused extreme weather events & crop failures. Late in that year the troops of Flavius Belisarius seized Naples by using an abandoned aqueduct to capture the city by surprise: Is this a duplicate story of the mentioned seizure, as well as the seizure of Troy?

Attila the Hun

Know as the "Scourge of God", he conquered an empire ranging from the Roman Limes to the Ural Mountains: The European part of the Heartland, extending from Hungary to Yugra, comparable to the territory of the Golden Horde at its peak. On his way to Aurelianum, he got defeated for the first time on the Catalaunian Plains. His name is similar to a Khazar capital & another name for the Volga river:

• Switching vowels might turn it into Ital(ia)
• Reversing consonants might turn it into Lati(um)

In Romance languages, a royal dynasty ruling the region of the Во́лга river might be translated as 'Casa Итиль': It can be contracted to Castil(ia), which on itself leads to 'castle'. It arises the following questions:

• Mainstream history tells us he didn't conquer any part of the Rimland, but might Catalaunia be Catalonia?
• The origins of the Etruscans are unknown: Could they be 'ET-Rus-Khans', or Khazar nobility?

We might make the following comparison with the wars of Carolus Magnus:

• The immigration of the Etruscans = The suppression of the Lombards
• The battle on the Catalaunian Plains = The battle of the Ronceveaux Pass

According to Heribert Illig, this phantom character never existed: So where did the inspiration for the story of this 'Great King' come from? From the 'Genghis Khan' who, according to the New Chronology, conquered Europe? He might have built castles to maintain control, helped by his brother Khasar?