Titus Andronicus

This revenge tragedy of William Shakespeare shows the adventures of a general returning from a succesful military campaign. His name contains a Greek & an Italian part ...

According to the New Chronology, Andronicus is a partial duplicate of Jesus Christ, but also Titus is a candidate: Flavius Josephus might have been inpired by the life of the future emperor to create the character of the saviour to pacify the Jews. As well as Julius Caesar, he got deified and both of them won a famous seven year lasting war: Do these similarities hint to a partial duplicate?

The daughter of the protagonist bears the name of the second wife of Aeneas: According to Virgil, Turnus was the foreseen groom, but due to a dream Latinus changed his mind. Shakespreare wrote she was promised to Saturninus, but fell in love with his brother and fled with him. Is the character of the foreseen groom based on the king of the Rutulians?

However, in the revenge tragedy, Tamora and her surviving sons manage to kill Bassianus and rape Lavinia, whereas in the epic poem Turnus got killed earlier, so the storyline is different. Some authors identify the mentioned king as Titus, so might the inspiration for the mentioned rape come from the Abduction of the Sabine Women?

That event led to a shared reign of Titus & Romulus: After six years of mutual reign, the king of the Sabines got killed over a dispute. This resembles the fate of Remus: Gary Forsythe even claims the mentioned king was the first ruler of Rome, Romulus & Remus are only mythical characters in his opinion, as might the eldest sons of Adam & Eve be ...

According to the New Chronology, the life of the saviour inspired the author of the mentioned revenge tragedy a lot, cause also Hamlet, MacDuff & Apemantus seem to be partial duplicates of him, sometimes in a combination with John the Baptist. On the other hand, Lear & Henry VIII seem to be duplicates of Ivan the Terrible. His oeuvre is contemperary to that of Joseph Scaliger ...

Three Kings

Celebrated as Epiphany, the Magi arrived in Bethlehem to witness the birth of the king of the Jews: The physical manifestation of Jesus Christ to the גוים. Their number isn't mentioned in the gospel, but Western Christianity counts three of them, according to the number of gifts brought. Their origin remains a debate ...

According to the New Chronology, Melchior was even female, the מַלְכַּת שְׁבָא or ملكة سبأ, where Balthazar seems to be king, according to Hugo Kehrer. However, did the "White Tsar" rule the region between the Baltic Sea & the Balkan Peninsula, meaning "White Khanate", or "White Horde"?

That region is known for its very fertile soil: Bethlehem would be an appropriate name, opposite of Bethany, on the other side of the Black Sea. According to the New Chronology, the saviour was born in Crimea, could that be right?

The Armenian Church identifies Balthazar as king of Arabia, which might be a synonym for Europe. There Melchior is identified as king of Persia, which might mean Paris, but Johann von Hildesheim identifies him also as king of Nubia, where Caspar, according to the novel of Michel Tournier, is king of Meroë. That novelist might have been inspired by Piye, who defeated Sennacherib @ Jerusalem, or Memnon, who defeated Antilochus @ Troy, as described in Αἰθιοπίς: Might these stories be partial duplicates?

According to mainstream history, their relics have been brought from the Hagia Sophia, via Milan, finally to Cologne Cathedral. The Three Kings of Orion collinearly point, via Sirius, to the sunrise on Christmas around the Tropic of Cancer. By definition, Magi are Zoroastrian priests, so might the earthly tale, stuffed with gifts from Sheba, have been inspired by the long trek of Tiridates?

Three Maries

As big supporter of Jezus Christ, Mary Magdalene seems to be the first witness of his resurrection: She even might have fled to Gaul, been his wife & author of a gospel. These namesakes also lived during the epoch of the saviour: Mary the Virgin, Mary of Bethany, Mary of Clopas & Mary the Peaceful. Some might be duplicates, but also form groups of "Three Maries":

• In the sixth century, a pope identified Mary Magdalene as Mary of Bethany. Together with Mary the Virgin & Mary of Clopas, she attended the saviour's crucifixion.
• In the fifteenth century, someone claimed to have found the relics of Mary of Clopas & Mary the Peaceful near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, where they seem to have arrived by boat, together with Mary Magdalene. Also Mary of Bethany, together with her siblings Lazarus & Martha, seems to have arrived there.

According to Eastern Orthodoxy, Lazarus fled to Cyprus. According to mainstream history, emperor Andronikos Komnenos died in Constantinople, but some claim he managed to escape to Cyprus. Is the bishop of Kition a partial duplicate of the emperor, which might be a partial duplicate of the saviour?

That escape is similar to the escape of Aeneas, a name very similar to Aenon: The emperor had estates in Oinaion, so might he also be a partial duplicate of the saviour?

Could the son of Anchises have arrived by boat near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, instead of in Latium?

• Lavinium is similar to Avignon, where the popes lived in Babylonian Captivity
• Ascanius might have migrated as far as Avallon, similar to Alba Longa or Avalon, close to Paris, Troyes, Reims & Autun
• Brutus founded Tours before crossing the Channel

Are the Cathars right in claiming the saviour had a wife?

Stanley Kubrick

An increasing population in a finite habitat evolves to less resources per person: It increases the challenge to achieve it fully for all of humanity. However, till now, mankind rather evolved in the other direction, resulting in more dehumanization, the theme throughout the oeuvre of Kubrick ...

According to mainstream history, already since the dawn of man, sexism divided humanity into male hunters & female gatherers. When civilization evolved, the list can be extended, depending on the type of social system, according to Wallerstein:

• In mini-systems it might be profession or age
• In world-systems it might be social class or racism

Social class & racism in a world-system allow an international division of labour: The elite share a little bit of the profits with the working class in the core of the world-system, deliberately creating a fake psyche of happiness they’re less victim to dehumanization than their classmates in the periphery. The aim for the elite is clear: Maintaining the capitalist world-economy for their own benefits as long as possible ...

By hiding the real history of humanity people are unaware of their origin, which benefits the agenda of the elite too. As Orwell quoted: "Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." That's also why our mainstream education, science & media try to indoctrinate you they're the only source to believe in, that way actually admitting they're a religion too!

Although great personalities in our history have tried to change this trend, an unaware, maybe intelligent unable, population still allowed the elite to abuse this ignorance during the larger part of our history. But their greed is not only harming the majority of humanity, also our habitat is in danger. As Gandhi quoted: "The world has enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed." An awakened humanity is necessary to turn the tide!

Samalas Eruption

In 1257 AD one of the largest volcanic eruptions took place on Lombok, causing worldwide catastrophies the subsequent years, possibly even resulting in the Little Ice Age. It was an outburst of similar strength as the well knows of Santorini, Vesuvius, Tambora & Krakatoa ...

In The Medieval Empire of the Israelites, the authors describe that glacial cores point out a catastrophe must have taken place around 1260 AD. Ten years later, scientists concluded Segara Anak was the result of that catastrophic eruption. For these authors, the mentioned year is a key to understand history, some important historical turning points took place around that time:

• The Mamluk Sultanate beat the Mongol Empire near Ain Jalut, a first major defeat for the conquering nomads (1260 AD)
• The Byzantines besieged Constantinopolis, ultimately resulting in its seizure by Alexios Strategiopoulos (1261 AD)
• The Castilians captured Cadiz, ending the Reconquista, only allowing tribute paying Nasrids on the peninsula (1262 AD)

Although at first glance these events seem unconnected to each other, some interesting questions arise:

• As the Mongols, the Byzantines got defeated first, however the latter ones were succesful one year later: Might the spring of Goliath refer to the spring near Constantinople, of which the nearby gate contributed to the surprising seizure?
• Cadiz means stronghold, while Constantinople is famous for its walls: Could it be the former ones captured it too under their pseudonym Castilians, although mainstream history claims otherwise?

Considering these similarities, is one real historical blueprint used to, at least partially, invent some fake histories for different regions, so creating some fake history & hiding some real history?

About one millenium earlier, around 536 AD, a volcanic eruption also caused extreme weather events & crop failures. Late in that year the troops of Flavius Belisarius seized Naples by using an abandoned aqueduct to capture the city by surprise: Is this a duplicate story of the mentioned seizure, as well as the seizure of Troy?

Attila the Hun

Know as the "Scourge of God", he conquered an empire ranging from the Roman Limes to the Ural Mountains: The European part of the Heartland, extending from Hungary to Yugra, comparable to the territory of the Golden Horde at its peak. On his way to Aurelianum, he got defeated for the first time on the Catalaunian Plains. His name is similar to a Khazar capital & another name for the Volga river:

• Switching vowels might turn it into Ital(ia)
• Reversing consonants might turn it into Lati(um)

In Romance languages, a royal dynasty ruling the region of the Во́лга river might be translated as 'Casa Итиль': It can be contracted to Castil(ia), which on itself leads to 'castle'. It arises the following questions:

• Mainstream history tells us he didn't conquer any part of the Rimland, but might Catalaunia be Catalonia?
• The origins of the Etruscans are unknown: Could they be 'ET-Rus-Khans', or Khazar nobility?

We might make the following comparison with the wars of Carolus Magnus:

• The immigration of the Etruscans = The suppression of the Lombards
• The battle on the Catalaunian Plains = The battle of the Ronceveaux Pass

According to Heribert Illig, this phantom character never existed: So where did the inspiration for the story of this 'Great King' come from? From the 'Genghis Khan' who, according to the New Chronology, conquered Europe? He might have built castles to maintain control, helped by his brother Khasar?

Ivan the Terrible

Know as the first Tsar of all Rus, Ivan added the Ta(r)tar khanates of Kazan & Astrakhan to his realm, turning it into an empire. However, the subsequent Livonian War was a disaster, the Ta(r)tar knanate of Crimea nearly succesfully raided his capital. During his reign, the conquest of the Ta(r)tar khanate of Sibir started. The New Chronology tells a similar story:

• The conquest of Kazan = The suppression of the Khazars
• The war in Livonia = The reformation in Europe
• The conquest of Sibir = The suppression of the Mexicans

Khan Kuchum ruled east of the Ural Mountains. Sounds can have different consonants, for example 'CH' = 'X' & 'K' = 'C': Reversing the consonants & switching the vowels might lead to 'Mexic(o)', whose reverse is '(O)cixem', or Shechem: Can we also associate it with 'Meshech', its near reverse, together with 'Tubal', refering to Tobolsk, the lands where Magog ruled, whereas 'Rosh' refers to Russia?

Грозный might be a duplicate of Великий, and in reality be an assemblance of four real characters, according to the New Chronology:

• Ivan Vasilyevich
• Dmitry Ivanovich
• Ivan Ivanovich
• Simeon Bekbulatovich

Is it a Romanov conspiracy to claim the Russian throne, after the Time of Troubles? It might fit in the framework of Wallerstein to alter real history for giving birth to nationalistic ideologies to supply the existence of a world-economy: Is it a coincidence that the VOC, the very first MNC, had its origin aroud that time?

The Oprichnina was a first answer to an attempt to gain power by the Romanovs, which they might have covered up later. What else happened to our real history?

Mehmed the Conqueror

Almost one millenium after Rome fell to the Germans, after a siege of seven weeks the Turks finally conquered Constantinople: These events can respectively be considered as start & end of our known Middle Ages. During this epoch, the Byzantine capital endured yet many sieges ...

After the conquest, sultan Mehmed quite quickly ordered the construction of the Eyüp Sultan shrine, honoring the standard-bearer of prophet Muhammad, who supposedly died there during a former siege: Almost eight centuries later, a religious scholar suddenly seems to do discover the burial spot. According to the New Chronology, sultan & prophet are duplicates: the standard-bearer probably died during the last siege of the city, the mentioned timespan fits closely in the difference between chronological shifts they discovered ...

The sultan mainly focused on Europe, possibly derived from the Hebrew "עֶרֶב" or Greek "Ἔρεβος": Switching vowels may clearify why the prophet conquered Arabia, it's quite curious we find Arabic inscriptions on Roman mantles or Russian weaponry. According to the New Chronology, the conqueror had more partial duplicates, for example:

• Thutmose, with the conquest of Kadesh
• Nebuchadnezzar, with the destruction of Jerusalem
• Moses, whose successor Joshua immediately conquers Jericho
• Philip, whose successor Alexander immediately conquers Troy
• Timur, with the liberation of Samarkand
• Ivan, with the conquest of Kazan

Which story fits best the real history? Astronomy even associates the Apocalypse with the mentioned conquest ...

John the Baptist

As a cleansing rite, John baptised Jesus, an act inspiring some Christians as follows:

• In his First Corinthian Epistle, Paul compared it with the Exodus: Mozes & his people crossing יַם-סוּף meant purification
• According to apostle Simon, it's similar to the Deluge: Noah & his family were purified after floating on the water

Like many other Jewish celebrities, his mother gave birth on a rather high age, after being infertile for a while: A sign for an important life protected by the Holy Spirit. As the character of Jesus might be a mixture of Andrey Bogolyubsky & Andronikos Komnenos, the New Chronology suggests John's might be one of those of:

• Saint Leontius & Saint Theodore from the Golden Ring
• Alexios Branas & John Komnenos from the Golden Horn

The baptist worked near Αἰνών in בֵּית עַנְיָה. Before becoming emperor, Andronikos Komnenos lived on his ancestral estates in Οἰνόη: Is the same town mentioned? Paintings suggest a fertile working habitat, not a desert: Should we rather understand the deserted countryside?

Lazarus originated from Bethany & moved to Kition: According to the New Chronology, Jesus installed him as a bishop in the 中國城市 before going to Царьград, where he cleansed the Temple. The priests plotted against him, making him flee from Jerusalem to Bethany, where he got baptised in Aenon: Are we talking about Oinaion in Bithynia?

Criticizing the unlawful marriage of Herodes Antipas got the baptist imprisoned: His influence on the people was feared. Inspired by her mother, Salome requested the head of the baptist, but according to Flavius Josephus he just might have been executed. According to Muslims, his skull is kept in the الْجَامِع الْأُمَوِي, but other sanctuaries also claim to keep his relics ...

Merlin the Magician

A shapeshifting druid functioning as the tutor of the legendary king Arthur: Emrys Wledig & Myrddin Wyllt are the historical sources for the famous wizard. Latinised as Ambrosius Aurelianus, the first source appeared in different historical sources:

• According to Geoffrey of Monmouth, together with his brother Uther, he returned from Little Britain to Great Britain: They landed on the same spot as Brutus of Troy, to defeat the Saxons, restoring British rule ...
• According to Nennius of Wales, he also defeated them. Before that happened, the druid existed as Myrddin Emrys, who became an advisor of Vortigern: The "Story of Llud & Llefelys" completes this "Tale of two Dragons" ...
• According to Gildas the Wise, he was the "Last of the Romans": After the devastating passage of Hengist, this surviving warlord organised an army and took revenge. Bede the Venerable tells a similar story ...

Is any of these stories fully correct?

It seems Emrys Wledig sent his troops to Ireland for cutting stones to be used in the construction of a memorial near the place of slaughter of their nobles. However, his soldiers weren't able to dismantle the stones, so he asked Myrddin Emrys for help: Applying his magic, in one night he managed to bring them from Mount Killaraus to Salisbury Plain, although archeological research seems to pone the stones stood, at least for a while, at Preseli Hills. Even that transfer of those stones is quite challenging: Did the druid have access to technology that might be lost today?

He also led the construction of Stonehenge: Giants helped him, though Brutus of Troy already wiped them out. Did Gogmagog & his brethren resurrect, or was Brutus a duplicate of Ambrosius that killed those giants afterwards, or did some stories mix up?