Stanley Kubrick

An increasing population in a finite habitat evolves to less resources per person: It increases the challenge to achieve it fully for all of humanity. However, till now, mankind rather evolved in the other direction, resulting in more dehumanization, the theme throughout the oeuvre of Kubrick ...

According to mainstream history, already since the dawn of man, sexism divided humanity into male hunters & female gatherers. When civilization evolved, the list can be extended, depending on the type of social system, according to Wallerstein:

• In mini-systems it might be profession or age
• In world-systems it might be social class or racism

Social class & racism in a world-system allow an international division of labour: The elite share a little bit of the profits with the working class in the core of the world-system, deliberately creating a fake psyche of happiness they’re less victim to dehumanization than their classmates in the periphery. The aim for the elite is clear: Maintaining the capitalist world-economy for their own benefits as long as possible ...

By hiding the real history of humanity people are unaware of their origin, which benefits the agenda of the elite too. As Orwell quoted: "Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." That's also why our mainstream education, science & media try to indoctrinate you they're the only source to believe in, that way actually admitting they're a religion too!

Although great personalities in our history have tried to change this trend, an unaware, maybe intelligent unable, population still allowed the elite to abuse this ignorance during the larger part of our history. But their greed is not only harming the majority of humanity, also our habitat is in danger. As Gandhi quoted: "The world has enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed." An awakened humanity is necessary to turn the tide!

Samalas Eruption

In 1257 AD one of the largest volcanic eruptions took place on Lombok, causing worldwide catastrophies the subsequent years, possibly even resulting in the Little Ice Age. It was an outburst of similar strength as the well knows of Santorini, Vesuvius, Tambora & Krakatoa ...

In The Medieval Empire of the Israelites, the authors describe that glacial cores point out a catastrophe must have taken place around 1260 AD. Ten years later, scientists concluded Segara Anak was the result of that catastrophic eruption. For these authors, the mentioned year is a key to understand history, some important historical turning points took place around that time:

• The Mamluk Sultanate beat the Mongol Empire near Ain Jalut, a first major defeat for the conquering nomads (1260 AD)
• The Byzantines besieged Constantinopolis, ultimately resulting in its seizure by Alexios Strategiopoulos (1261 AD)
• The Castilians captured Cadiz, ending the Reconquista, only allowing tribute paying Nasrids on the peninsula (1262 AD)

Although at first glance these events seem unconnected to each other, some interesting questions arise:

• As the Mongols, the Byzantines got defeated first, however the latter ones were succesful one year later: Might the spring of Goliath refer to the spring near Constantinople, of which the nearby gate contributed to the surprising seizure?
• Cadiz means stronghold, while Constantinople is famous for its walls: Could it be the former ones captured it too under their pseudonym Castilians, although mainstream history claims otherwise?

Considering these similarities, is one real historical blueprint used to, at least partially, invent some fake histories for different regions, so creating some fake history & hiding some real history?

About one millenium earlier, around 536 AD, a volcanic eruption also caused extreme weather events & crop failures. Late in that year the troops of Flavius Belisarius seized Naples by using an abandoned aqueduct to capture the city by surprise: Is this a duplicate story of the mentioned seizure, as well as the seizure of Troy?